After 105 you stop aging - now to make it past 100


After 105 you stop aging - now to make it past 100

Research has found that death rates begin to decelerate after 80 years old and then approach a plateau after 105, before starting to dip slightly

Sarah Knapton

Living until the age of 100 may seem like a worthy goal, but a new study suggests that centenarians should really be aiming to survive past 105, for that’s when their risk of death stops rising and even begins to decline.
Curious new research has found that death rates, which increase exponentially with age, begin to decelerate after 80 years old and then approach a plateau after 105, before starting to dip slightly.It means that people who make it past 105 appear to have slightly less chance of dying than someone slightly younger.
An international team of researchers from Italy, Germany, Denmark and the US studied the survival rates of nearly 4,000 people over 105 between 2009 and 2015.
In Britain the lowest chance of death occurs between the ages of four and 15 when men have one in a 8,333 chance of dying annually, and women one in 10,417, according to figures from the Office for National Statistics (ONS).
Between 35 and 44 that risk has risen for men to one in 663 and women to one in 1,106, and by the age of 75 it is one in 15 for men and one in 21 for women.However the new research found that, counter-intuitively, as people get very old their chance of dying starts to tail off and may even start to reverse, which may indicate that human longevity is increasing overall.
For people who are above 105, the risk levels off at around 47% risk of death – roughly a one in two chance and stays at that level, or even dips slightly, up to 110 and beyond.
Lead author Elisabetta Barbi, of Sapienza University of Rome, said: “The increasing number of exceptionally long-lived people and the fact that their mortality beyond 105 is seen to be declining across cohorts strongly suggests that longevity is contributing to increase over time and that a limit, if any, has not yet been reached.
“Our results contribute to a recently rekindled debate about the existence of a fixed maximum lifespan for humans, underwriting doubt that any limit is as yet in view.”Since the 19th century average life expectancy has risen almost continuously, with a baby born today expected to live until 81, compared to just 50 years in 1900. But recent research by Albert Einstein College of Medicine suggested that imperfections in the copying of genes will always mean there is finite limit to human life and claimed 125 is the upper limit of human lifespan.  
The longest human lifespan to date is that of Jeanne Calment of France (1875–1997), who lived to the age of 122 years, 164 days.Co-author Ken Wachter,  professor of Demography and Statistics, Emeritus University of California,  said by the time people had lived to 105 they had shown the ability to battle most diseases and conditions.
“There has been selection – those initially less frail are the  ones who tend to survive to 105. 
“Processes of selection are likely balancing further debilitation. This selection likely also involves loads of genetic variants with harmful effects, whose effects at extreme ages have been kept in check by processes of natural selection.”
The ONS found that the oldest people are getting older. Between 2002 and 2016 the proportion of the older over-90s rose in comparison with younger groups.
The new research was published in the journal Science. 
– © The Daily Telegraph

This article is reserved for Sunday Times Daily subscribers.
A subscription gives you full digital access to all Sunday Times Daily content.

Sunday Times Daily

Already subscribed? Simply sign in below.

Questions or problems?
Email or call 0860 52 52 00.

Next Article