We've got news for you.

Register on Sunday Times at no cost to receive newsletters, read exclusive articles & more.
Register now

Flying the nest: Why young adults often refuse to take wing


Flying the nest: Why young adults often refuse to take wing

Much like humans, parents of wild southern pied babbler chicks are also struggling to get their kids out of the nest

Cape Town bureau chief

Parents of millennials still living at home aren’t the only ones with children that refuse to leave.
Research at the University of Cape Town has provided answers on the same phenomenon in the animal kingdom.
Martha Nelson-Flower, a postdoctoral fellow at the Percy FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology, studied the behaviour of wild southern pied babblers, which live in family groups of up to 14 in the Kalahari Desert in South Africa.Her findings, published in the Journal of Animal Ecology, suggest that better prospects elsewhere, as well as family dynamics between brothers and stepfathers, play a big part in determining when offspring disperse.
Nelson-Flower — who began studying the birds in 2006 for her PhD — used 11 years of data to investigate how the dispersal of male and female babblers was affected by their position in the group social hierarchy, conditions in the environment, and the benefits of staying in their group.She discovered large distinctions between the sexes. Female birds were more independent but tended to remain at home when in a larger (and therefore safer) group. In contrast, males left only when they had improved chances of leading a group of their own elsewhere.
“Males often leave when there’s more rain, which probably means there’s more food in the environment,” said Nelson-Flower. “They also leave when there are more breeding vacancies for males, and they leave when the distance between groups is small.
“We think that’s because they’re more likely to encounter other groups, and they can check to see if there are any breeding vacancies in those groups.”However, a male’s position in the group social hierarchy made a big difference to their decision to disperse. Brothers queued for an opportunity to inherit the leadership of their group, or that of a neighbouring group; by leaving early, younger brothers could boost their queue position and improve their prospects.
Males with step-fathers also left early, probably because step-fathers prioritise their own, younger sons in the queue.
In contrast, females lower in the pecking order did not leave early but bided their time, waiting for opportunities to overthrow dominant females in other groups.
Nelson-Flower suggested this may be because they sometimes achieved dominance through extreme aggression. “A large, subordinate strong female would go to a group with a dominant female, and attack that female until she left. Sometimes sisters would come in pairs, and they would work together.”

This article is reserved for Sunday Times Daily subscribers.
A subscription gives you full digital access to all Sunday Times Daily content.

Sunday Times Daily

Already subscribed? Simply sign in below.

Questions or problems?
Email helpdesk@timeslive.co.za or call 0860 52 52 00.

Previous Article