Fur better or fur worse? Big names scarper from skin trade

Lifestyle

FASHION

Fur better or fur worse? Big names scarper from skin trade

Burberry is fur free, Tommy Hilfiger isn’t. American Vogue is, British Vogue isn’t … Time to get faux real

Rebecca Deucher

There is a deep division in the fashion industry on whether to participate in the global fur trade. Burberry will, Tommy Hilfiger won’t. American Vogue will, British Vogue won’t, and so it goes on.The $40-billion fur industry’s relationship with fashion is widely contested and has been for decades with supermodels including Naomi Campbell and Cindy Crawford claiming they’d rather go naked than wear fur.Brands such as Gucci, Michael Kors and Maison Margiela have recently announced that that they will be going fur-free, severing all previous ties with the global fur trade. After all this time, why the sudden change of heart?For Gucci fur has lost its modern edge. “It’s a little bit outdated,” says Marco Bizzarri, CEO of the Italian brand, insisting that it was not about “the millennials or the new generation”.
Millennials are thought to be more ethically focused than previous generations, identifying sustainability as a key aspect of their purchasing patterns.  They account for more than half of Gucci’s customers so it makes sense that the brand decided to go fur-free. Fur accounts for $11.8-million of Gucci’s profits annually and will be replaced by faux fur, wool and new fabric innovations (despite the popularity of their fur-lined loafers).Michael Kors is another brand that has recently gone fur-free. The years of parading models down the ramp in luxurious floor-length fur coats has come to an end as a result of increased pressure by animal rights groups and changing consumer tastes. The brand is attempting to evolve its use of innovative materials. “Due to technological advances in fabrications, we now have the ability to create a luxe aesthetic using non-animal fur,” says Michael Kors.
It doesn’t stop there. John Galliano’s Maison Margiela announced that it would go fur free this month. Galliano’s decision came after his interaction with PETA’s senior vice president, Dan Matthews, while on a beach in Saint-Tropez. According to Galliano the real luxury today “is authenticity and inventiveness” further explaining that “you can be outrageous and fun without fur”.Gucci, Michael Kors, and Maison Margiela are not the first and are joining already fur-free brands Calvin Klein, Ralph Lauren and Armani. Retailers including Selfridges and Net a Porter also do not sell fur.  Will more luxury brands commit to going fur-free in 2018? We will have to wait and see.

This article is reserved for Times Select subscribers.
A subscription gives you full digital access to all Times Select content.

Times Select

Already subscribed? Simply sign in below.

Questions or problems?
Email helpdesk@timeslive.co.za or call 0860 52 52 00.

Next Article

Previous Article