That’s all well and good, but a rewrite won’t answer these questions
We cannot move on from this matric crisis so quickly. Basic education must come up with a number of concrete solutions ... and tell us about them
Make no mistake, the leaking of two national senior certificate (NSC) papers in two gateway subjects (mathematics P2 and physical sciences P2), as well as the life sciences paper, has had devastating effects up and down the system. It has called into question the management capacity of the department of basic education, responsible for this high stakes examination. It has damaged the credibility of the NSC examination itself. And it has demoralised and deflated the 391,000 candidates who must rewrite the mathematics paper and the 282,000 who must show up again for the physical sciences paper. Think for a moment of the tremendous burden on children with emotional and intellectual disabilities having to raise themselves again to rewrite these stolen papers.
This leak is nothing short of a catastrophe and yet we move so quickly from “problem found” (the Hawks arrested Themba Daniel Shikwambana, who worked for the exam printing company) to “solution offered” (rewrite). That is not good enough. We need to ask tough questions of the authority endowed with the responsibility for managing and overseeing this critical examination in the lives of more than a million youth.
1. Why exactly did the paper leak? We need the minister to report in full to the general public. Parents want to know, pupils must know, schools ought to know. This time, it is not enough to be secretive and dodgy about the details or share them only with political insiders and Umalusi. Inform the public in full...