‘Concern’ about how the virus affects the poor masks fear and prejudice
The real worry is that what happens to the poverty stricken will be bad for those who are better off
Are the commenting classes worried about what the coronavirus might do to people living in poverty – or what its spread to poor people might do to them? A common reaction to the virus is driven by an open or implied fear that it will spread to the areas where poor people live, after which it will wreak havoc.
On the surface, this seems to express concern for millions who are struggling to get by. But poor people are usually seen by politics here not as an object of concern but as a problem: townships protests are taken far more seriously if they spill out onto roads and inconvenience motorists. The virus seems to be another case in which the real worry is not that bad things will happen to the poverty stricken, but that what happens to them will be bad for the middle class and the wealthy.
Around the world many in the middle classes and above see the places in which poor people live as health hazards. If a virus or epidemic threatens, they assume that once it spreads to taxi ranks, matchbox houses and shacks, it will consume all in its path, including those who live in leafy suburbs...