The STAR of the Steinhoff show wants to leave its orbit

Business

The STAR of the Steinhoff show wants to leave its orbit

Bizarre that 77% held subsidiary goes to such public lengths to try to distance itself from its parent

Ann Crotty

Steinhoff Africa Retail’s (STAR’s) annual general meeting was remarkable for a variety of reasons. Not only was it the first ever, having listed in September 2017, but it’s not often that a 77% held subsidiary goes to such public lengths to try to distance itself from its parent. In addition, there was not only the physical presence of institutional shareholders but also their active involvement.
It was always going to be an interesting affair but the vigour with which the board told shareholders attending STAR’s maiden AGM of its determination to distance itself from Steinhoff International – including a name change – was unprecedented. Given that Steinhoff owns 77% of STAR, its efforts to claim independence were not entirely persuasive. The reality is STAR can only be independent if Steinhoff allows it to be. That STAR is even listed was a contrivance orchestrated to suit Steinhoff’s purposes.
Shareholder activist Theo Botha says as things stand STAR should not have a separate listing; he points out there is not enough liquidity in the share.Lancaster 101, a vehicle controlled by STAR chairman Jayendra Naidoo, owns an additional 9% of STAR, which leaves just 14% of the shares in minority hands. Remarkably, despite his substantial interest in the company, Naidoo is described as an independent nonexecutive chairman. A significant chunk of minority shareholders voted against his reappointment but with 85.58% of the shares in the bag there was little chance of any change. When challenged about his “independent” tag Naidoo said that was the view the board took at the time of the September 2018 listing. “We’ve asked legal advisers to review the status,” said Naidoo.
News that Allen Swiegers, chairman of the audit and risk committee, had unexpectedly resigned from the board shortly before the AGM rattled some nerves, possibly because of Swiegers’s links with Atterbury Property Fund. Swiegers, who is chairman of the Atterbury Property Fund, which has a joint venture with Steinhoff, was with Deloitte’s for 33 years until he retired in 2016. He was appointed to the STAR board in August 2017. That Deloitte is both STAR’s and Steinhoff’s auditor was sufficient reason to question why Swieger was ever appointed chairman of the audit committee.At the AGM Mehluli Ncube, representing Eskom pension fund, wanted the auditors to tell shareholders what measures had been taken to ensure what had happened at Steinhoff had not spilled over. Naidoo refused permission to allow him to direct his questions to the auditors during the course of the AGM. “I’m not aware auditors are entitled to speak at this meeting, I will take it on advisement,” said Naidoo.
Ncube said he wanted to know what resources the auditors had to detect the sort of fraud that had occurred at Steinhoff and was said to be difficult to detect. “The auditors are at the centre of all these issues and we tend to give them the green light.”After the meeting Ncube said he was puzzled by Naidoo’s response. “In the financial statements the auditors raised three audit matters they described as key without giving a satisfactory explanation; I thought the board would go all out to comfort us on these issues,” said Ncube.
He also raised concerns about the price STAR paid for Tekkie Town, which was almost double what the company had been valued at a few years earlier. “There was no growth in the business, we need to look at that valuation.”
STAR CEO Leon Lourens told the meeting the value placed on Tekkie Town was “reasonable” based on the company’s performance.Shareholders were reminded of just how strong the ties are between STAR and its parent when Steve Muller, chairman of the remuneration committee explained that the 2018 income statement will take a R90-million hit to bail out senior STAR executives who were awarded Steinhoff share options in 2016. The share options are totally valueless. “It was crucial to keep these people and ensure they were motivated so we have bailed them out and have paid the first tranche a year early,” said Muller adding that the money would be recouped from provisions in 2019.

This article is reserved for Times Select subscribers.
A subscription gives you full digital access to all Times Select content.

Times Select

Already subscribed? Simply sign in below.

Questions or problems?
Email helpdesk@timeslive.co.za or call 0860 52 52 00.

Previous Article